Prioritises overdue accounts by risk and drafts the follow-up. A person still hits send.
The agent decides who to chase and drafts the message. A person still hits send.
Money and customer relationships both need a human in the loop, this agent assumes that.
Only two of them need a person.
Overdue accounts reordered by real risk, not just balance size.
A follow-up written in a tone that matches the account and the stage.
Queued for a person to read, edit, or bin before it goes out.
Replies, promises, and disputes logged against the account automatically.
Accounts that stall past an agreed point get flagged for a human decision.
Priced per engagement, based on customer volume and the number of entities involved, plus the Copilot Credits it uses to draft and prioritise. We scope both up front.
An ambiguous reply, a disputed amount, or an unfamiliar payment pattern gets flagged for a person rather than drafted around.
Every message is drafted, not sent, nothing reaches a customer without someone reading it, so tone problems get caught before they go out.
Yes, as long as terms and aging rules are configured per entity, it works from your setup, not a single default.
Templates don't read the account history or adjust tone by risk and stage. This does, and it still leaves the send decision with a person.
Bring your current AR aging report and we'll show you what it would flag first.
See the prioritisation and the drafts it produces, side by side.
Talk through how it would slot into your current collections process.